Diversion Programs Essay

merriment programs be ordinarily misunderstood by society, and in some cases is conceptualise that they do non work. However research conducted by polar organizations has found that they in fact do constrain recidivism amongst freshs diverted V. those that were not. Diversion as describe refers to the attempt to divert, or channel out, c each(prenominal)ownessful offenders from the modern justice system (Bynum and Thompson, 1996430). In this paper it pull up stakes be discuss what are the causes of new-made unlawful behavior, and what goals does the cardinal different diversion programs urinate to combat those behaviors and rehabilitate new-fashioneds. Also it allow for discuss what inspection and repair do they propose and witch one and only(a) is the about effectual.First of all when talking about juvenile vice research has found that no case-by-case cause of behavior accounts for all delinquency, however that report card is inconclusive since the study h as not been confirmed atomic weigh 6%. The Office of Juvenile Justice and offense prevention (OJJDP) is sponsoring the research and is concentrate oning in serious delinquency and do drugs abuse as those ii have been found to be the leading causeways of juvenile guilty behavior. OJJDP has conducted causes and correlation studies designed to improve the understanding of delirium and drug abuse, they have seemed at how a young person develops within the context of family, school, peers and their respective community.One of the challenges is to visualise the longitudinal investigating since some times this juveniles turn into what society determines as adulthood, and the investigation is no longer valid. The way they have conducted this searches is by sampling youthfulnesss in a six to nightclub months period one example is Denver youth includes 1,527 youths ages vary from seven-spot to 15, and they all come from different backgrounds but pronominally from high risk neig hborhoodsThe key participants for this programs as described above are juveniles thattheir age ranges from seven to 15 forms of age, as per the report published by the OJJDP in September, 1999 2.8 million juveniles were arrested, since then that number has declined one of the causes for this is the improvement in diversion programs. As one of the analysts puts it Diverting appropriate youthful offenders from detention tail end pay dividends for youth who are not a danger to themselves and for those continueing in detention. It overly alleviates overcrowding (Bilchik S, 1999)This paper is exanimating two different diversion programs in the Dallas area the Dallas County Juvenile Department believes that for certain youth, interposition rather than punishment alone is the most effective strategy in avoiding future involvement with the juvenile justice system. Diversion programs offer youth an probability to agree on voluntary conditions that closely gibe probation, but are imp osed by the probation officer instead of the Court. First time offenders with minor offenses and refer certain criminal behavior risk factors may be eligible for specific diversion programs. roaring completion of the agreed conditions allows these youth to avoid show in Court, and prevent them from permeating into the juvenile system. (DCJV, 2014) With all that said the two diversions programs used are one is the Diversion Male Court (D.M.C.) targets minority antherals with archetypical time and minor referrals.Using community-based alternatives to empower the youth and family, D.M.C. aims to reduce the disproportionate representation of minority manlike youth in the juvenile justice system. community service providers in conjunction with the probation officer focus on issues which predispose the identified minority male youth to delinquent behavior. (DCJV, 2014) And the otherwise is the Drug Diversion Court that identifies and intervenes with youth who have a floor of su bstance abuse. Youth involved in the program participate in community-based drug treatment programs, take care weekly court sessions, submit to regular drug testing, and consistently report to their probation officer. They receive the tools and support needful to live a drug-free life and remain out of the justice system. (DCJV, 2014) As of 2013 drug link offenses involving juveniles in the Dallas county area went up from the previous year in 2002 in that location were 94 and in 2013 there were 111. As far as assaults they were down from 2012 to 2013 from 244 to 229. nerve-wracking to identify the effectiveness of these programs is complicated since they are involving two different offenses, however more than often than not they are related. Assaults and drug offenses are closely even together in the juvenile criminal world. plainly their goal is the same in both cases to reduce the number of youth in detention and to provide them with some sort of community based program, in order to keep them occupied and help to rehabilitate them, and in return this will reduce recidivism amongst juveniles. If we were to look at just numbers I will say that the Drug Diversion Court has had more success in the Dallas area with its programs, however that can be disproportional because the amount of offenses.In cobblers last this paper covered what is diversion, how it is applied and how it does work for two different programs in the Dallas county area. It is important to remember that this as effective as it might be in the Dallas area is not the same in other areas, disproportion on the studies and in the way that some ethnicities are group, and not to forget the age, makes it hard for this studies to be atomic number 6% accurate.ReferencesBynum, J.E., and Thompson, W.E. 1996. Juvenile Delinquency A Sociological Approach. 3d ed. Bullington, B., Sprowls, J., Katkin, D., and Phillips, M. 1978. Critique of diversionary juvenile justice. Crime and Delinquency 24(1)59-71 . Dallas County Juvenile Department (DCJV, 2014) extracted information from www.dallascounty.org/department/juvenile/drug_diversion.php