Friday, May 31, 2019

The Schlieffen Plan Essay -- World War II WWII WW2 Nazi Germany

The Schlieffen devise was devised by numbering Alfred von Schlieffen, the Chief of the General Staff in the German army in 1905. There were a event of different aspects to the Schlieffen intention, and all were aimed at defeating France as readily as possible, preferably in under 6 weeks. The Germans believed this was possible because they had defeated France in Alsace and Lorraine in the 1871. The important aim of the Schlieffen Plan was to knock out and suffer France and then attack Russia in order to avoid fighting a contend on both fronts at the same time. The second aspect to the Schlieffen Plan was to invade neutral Belgium as a souseds to get to France, because the German-Franco border was heavily fortified and would mean almost certain defeat for Germany. Even though the Germans k crude about the Treaty of London signed between Britain and Belgium in 1839, Kaiser Wilhelm II did not believe that Britain would come on to Belgiums aid over a scrappy bit of paper. The third aspect to the Plan was to use the 1st to 4th armies to go with Belgium and Holland to outflank the French and attack them from behind at Lorraine where the German 5th to eighth armies were holding, attack from the French forces and even give them a little anchor to allow the Germans to get behind the French. In the member the Germans would be able to take Paris, the capital as they moved south to join the 5th to 8th armies in Lorraine. The whole of the Schlieffen Plan depended on adhering to a strict timetable, which in theory was a good idea on behalf of the German staff, but in reality it did not take into consideration factors much(prenominal) as soldiers fatigue in marching long distances and unexpected resistance by the British military Force at the and the Belgia... ...e Germans arrived in France, the French were mend waiting to repel them. In conclusion, the main aim of the Schlieffen Plan was for Germany to avoid fighting a war on two fronts at the same time . The Plan failed for a number of reasons, but the most important was the unexpected resistance put up by the brave Belgians at Mons and the support habituated by the BEF at the Battle of the Marne. This meant that von Moltke had to divert his armies from encircling Paris, dig trenches to protect his soldiers from the bombardment form the new artillery, and thereby negate the crux of the Schlieffen Plan, which had depended on speed, whack out and capturing Paris in six weeks. The Germans found themselves stuck in France while the Russians had mobilized The Germans then had to fight a war on two fronts - the very position which the Schlieffen Plan had been devised to avoid. The Schlieffen Plan Essay -- World War II WWII WW2 Nazi GermanyThe Schlieffen Plan was devised by Count Alfred von Schlieffen, the Chief of the General Staff in the German army in 1905. There were a number of different aspects to the Schlieffen Plan, and all were aimed at defeating France as quick ly as possible, preferably in under 6 weeks. The Germans believed this was possible because they had defeated France in Alsace and Lorraine in the 1871. The main aim of the Schlieffen Plan was to knock out and capture France and then attack Russia in order to avoid fighting a war on two fronts at the same time. The second aspect to the Schlieffen Plan was to invade neutral Belgium as a means to get to France, because the German-Franco border was heavily fortified and would mean almost certain defeat for Germany. Even though the Germans knew about the Treaty of London signed between Britain and Belgium in 1839, Kaiser Wilhelm II did not believe that Britain would come to Belgiums aid over a scrappy bit of paper. The third aspect to the Plan was to use the 1st to 4th armies to go through Belgium and Holland to outflank the French and attack them from behind at Lorraine where the German 5th to 8th armies were holding, attack from the French forces and even give them a little ground to allow the Germans to get behind the French. In the process the Germans would be able to take Paris, the capital as they moved south to join the 5th to 8th armies in Lorraine. The whole of the Schlieffen Plan depended on adhering to a strict timetable, which in theory was a good idea on behalf of the German staff, but in reality it did not take into consideration factors such as soldiers fatigue in marching long distances and unexpected resistance by the British Expeditionary Force at the and the Belgia... ...e Germans arrived in France, the French were ready waiting to repel them. In conclusion, the main aim of the Schlieffen Plan was for Germany to avoid fighting a war on two fronts at the same time. The Plan failed for a number of reasons, but the most important was the unexpected resistance put up by the brave Belgians at Mons and the support given by the BEF at the Battle of the Marne. This meant that von Moltke had to divert his armies from encircling Paris, dig trenches t o protect his soldiers from the bombardment form the new artillery, and thereby negate the crux of the Schlieffen Plan, which had depended on speed, knocking out and capturing Paris in six weeks. The Germans found themselves stuck in France while the Russians had mobilized The Germans then had to fight a war on two fronts - the very situation which the Schlieffen Plan had been devised to avoid.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Freedom And The Constitution :: essays research papers

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the beneficial to license of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. Freedom of expression is do up of the explicit correctlys of freedom of oral communication, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied upright of association and belief contained in the First Amendment. The Supreme motor inn interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been taken by the Court as applying to the entire federal government although it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. Two clauses in the First Amendment fasten freedom of religion. The get toment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official relig ion or preferring one religion over a nonher. It enforces the "separation of church and state. Some governmental activity related to religion has been declared thoroughgoing by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of "blue laws" is non prohibited. The free exercise clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a persons practice of their religion. The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech. The right of freedom of speech allows an individual to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial vindication for the interference with the right of free speech if it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognised that the government may prohib it some speech that may hasten a breach of the peace or cause violence. The right of free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicates a message. Despite popular misunderstanding the right of freedom of the press guaranteed by the first amendment is not very different from the right of freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the complete protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general. The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and law-abiding purposes.Freedom And The Constitution essays research papers The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. Freedom of expression is made up of the explicit rights of freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the governm ent for a redress of grievances, and the implied right of association and belief contained in the First Amendment. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government although it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the "separation of church and state. Some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of & quotblue laws" is not prohibited. The free exercise clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a persons practice of their religion. The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech. The right of freedom of speech allows an individual to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech if it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. The right of free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicates a message. Despite popular misunderstanding the right of freedom of the press guaranteed by the first amendment is not very different from the righ t of freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general. The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Post-Colonialism: Trying To Regain Ethnic Individuality :: essays research papers fc

Indeed, the oddish has unusual customs. The white man held the paper like a sacred thing. His hands shook, and we mistrusted him... For how many moons will the stranger be among us? (Vera 43)The stranger still lives among the people of Zimbabwe, though the colonial political authority has left. Yet I wonder if the town elder utterance in the above passage from Yvonne Veras Nehanda would recognize current Zimbabwean authorities as strangers or countrymen. Could he relate to todays government officials and understand the languages which they speak? Would he feel at home in an African country with borders defined by European imperial powers without regard to the various ethnic nations involved? Post-colonial theory attempts to explain problems such as these, yet it does so almost exclusively in the languages of the European colonial powers. Europeans even created the word Africa. "To name the world is to understand it, to cut it and to have control over it" (Ashcroft 283). Because knowledge is power, and words, whether written or spoken, atomic number 18 the medium of exchange, using words incurs responsibility.One must use special lot with broadly defined words and terms, such as post-colonial. Post-colonial literature describes a wide array of experiences set in the contexts of heterogeneous societies which themselves represent many contrastive ethnic groups. Ashcroft, Griffiths and Tiffin define post-colonial theory as discussion of "migration, slavery, suppression, resistance, representation, difference, race, gender, place, and responses to the influential master discourses of imperial Europe... and the fundamental experiences of speaking and writing by which all these cut into being" (Ashcroft 2). The wide-ranging nature of the term post-colonial threatens to weaken its usefulness by "diffusion... so extremethat it is used to refer to not only vastly contrastive but even opposed activities" (Ashcroft 2). Post-colonialism enc ompasses many of the issues encountered in the work we have discussed thus far in the semester. Yet because vague and generalized theories have limits and hunt to oversimplify, clouding over real problems, one must handle the term with care.Ashcroft, Griffiths, and Tiffin suggest that we should restrict the term post-colonial to signify after colonialism. "All post-colonial societies are still subject in one way or another to overt or subtle forms of neo-colonial domination, and independence has not solved the problem" (Ashcroft 2). later on colonialism, new elites, often in the form of dictators, frequently rose and still rise to power in post-colonial countries.